Creation Science Information & Links!
MAIN
F A Q
LINKS
ARTICLES
BOOKS
IMAGES
AUDIO

 
CARBON-14

CARBON-14 -Evolution needs time. It has to have it. Creation theory can survive either way - either 6,000 years, or long ages that "God" started and put into motion.  But for strict evolutionists lots and lots of time is required ... particularly since we don't see evolution happening in our world today!

Carbon-14 is but one of several radiometric dating methods that evolutionists consult when they build consensus on the age of particular fossils and (again by consensus, not by testable-repeatable science) decide how to arrange what they think our ancient history must have been.  They believe that with enough time and chance - just maybe some unscientific reactions may beat the odds and "improve all by themselves." God can then be ignored and evolutionists can claim to be logical and forward thinking in their ignorance of what's most important in this life. But if the long eons just weren't there in the first place then evolution falls like a house of cards.  The radioactive dating methods like Carbon-14, Potassium-Argon, and others, employ assumptions.  Parts of each measurement are based in known solid science, but there are assumed portions!  And it is a fact that often, even when they get the radiometric dates back from a sample they'll reject it in favor of their consensus instead.  But separate from that - there are other (non-radiometric) dating methods based upon Earth processes. We live on a dynamic (not static) planet; things are changing.

Evolutionary dating methods do not work and different methods used on the same sample often contradict each other. Secondly, derived supposed dates (from the same material samples) often completely contradict each other using the same radioactive dating method! Creationists can show example, after example, after example of documented bogus radiometric dates. (Please see the article links below.)

"Young Earth Creationists" believe that there is no good evidence supporting the notion that the Earth could be over 10,000 years old.  The true evidence just isn't there.  But there is very good evidence supporting belief in a very *young* Earth.  We're not "standing against science" in stating this - in fact we're the ones, though in the minority today, who are making the distinctions between bad evolutionary science (to prop up a particular religious belief system: atheism) and good, reliable science.  The major rivers (Nile, Mississippi, Yangtzee, etc.) all show only *thousands* of years of deposition.  The Earth isn't millions of years old - that's part of the religion of evolution, one that stands against science more often than it stands with science.

Evolutionists avoid the reliable Earth dating methods like vampires invited to afternoon surfing. Other Earth dating methods, ones that show a much younger Earth include: magnetic field decay, the rate of salinity increase in the oceans, helium accumulated in the atmosphere, major rivers erosion and deposition, and many others. Scientifically speaking, there is simply no way the Earth could be billions of years old. (And thus, evolution never had time to "happen" all by chance.) Evolution remains a spiritual deception cloaked in "science, falsely so called."  (text by P.A.)
 



 
"The Unreliability of Some Old-Earth Dating Methods" by Stephen Caesar - CrtnismOrg/caesar/datingunreliability.htm

"New Discovery Challenges Star-Dating Techniques" by Stephen Caesar - CrtnismOrg/caesar/pulsardating.htm

"An Australian Fossil Insect Bed Resulting from Cataclysmic Destruction" by Snelling - http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-329.htm

"Dubious Radiogenic Pb Behavior Places U-Th-Pb Mineral Dating in Doubt" by Snelling - http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-319.htm

" 'Excess Argon': The 'Achilles' Heel' of Potassium-Argon and Argon-Argon 'Dating' of Volcanic Rocks" by Snelling - http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-307.htm

"Potassium-Argon and Argon-Argon Dating of Crustal Rocks and the Problem of Excess Argon" by Snelling - http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-309.htm

"Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth" by Vardiman - http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-301.htm

"Radiometric Dating" AIG Section - http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dating.asp

"Life on Mars? A Mars Rock Update" CRS Newsletter - http://www.creationresearch.org/creation_matters/97/cm9703.html

"Physics Show that Six Day Creation is Possible" by K. Hovind - http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=21


 
MAIN
F A Q
LINKS
ARTICLES
BOOKS
IMAGES
AUDIO